Pali Canon for Claude

Letter to Buddhist Publication Society (BPS)

   
Status Draft, not sent
Ask Confirm BPS free-distribution texts on Access to Insight may be served with the BPS notice; permission or links for other BPS translations
Contact route bps@bps.lk and contact form at https://www.bps.lk/contact
Contact checked 1 November 2026

Before sending

Letter

Subject: BPS publications in a free scripture-study tool: a courtesy note and request

Dear friends at the Buddhist Publication Society,

I maintain Pali Canon for Claude (https://github.com/DaniilKi/pali-canon-claude), a free, open-source tool that helps AI assistants such as Claude look up and quote the Pāli Canon accurately instead of paraphrasing it from memory. When someone asks about a sutta, the assistant retrieves the actual passage from a named source and gives its citation (for example “MN 10” or “M i 55”), the translator or editor, the licence and a link to the original page. The tool is a library, not a teacher: it gives no rulings on practice and does not rank teachers or traditions.

How we use your work. Many translations on Access to Insight first appeared as BPS publications (the Wheel and Bodhi Leaves series and others), and carry the BPS free-distribution notice. When a reader asks for one of these, the tool fetches that page from Access to Insight and returns it with the BPS notice exactly as shown there, the translator and a link.

Other BPS translations, including works by Bhikkhu Bodhi and Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli that are not on Access to Insight, are at present only mentioned and linked to bps.lk. The tool contains none of their text.

These safeguards apply to everything the tool returns, and we would keep them for your work:

What we are asking.

  1. Please confirm that serving the BPS free-distribution texts already on Access to Insight, with the BPS notice, is in keeping with your terms.
  2. Would BPS allow short quotations, or direct links, for other BPS translations, with full credit and a link to bps.lk?
  3. Is there a credit line you would like us to use?

If it would help, I am happy to send more detail, show you the tool working, or change how your work is presented. A short reply is plenty, and “no” is a perfectly good answer: we will follow it.

With thanks and respect for your work,

[Maintainer’s name] Maintainer, Pali Canon for Claude — https://github.com/DaniilKi/pali-canon-claude Reply to: [maintainer’s email address]